Rules for predictable actions
Automation runs a sequence of actions after an event or at a scheduled time: creating a task, transferring data or preparing a reminder. AI is not needed when rules are sufficient.
Speak to an expert AIBS · Morocco
Connect tools, prepare follow-ups or find information: AIBS designs automations and AI assistants around your repetitive tasks, with rules, testing and approval points defined with your team.
Automation runs a sequence of actions after an event or at a scheduled time: creating a task, transferring data or preparing a reminder. AI is not needed when rules are sufficient.
An AI assistant can help summarise a request, draft a reply or find an answer in approved documents. Outputs still need checking, even when they sound convincing.
These scenarios illustrate possibilities, not completed client projects. Feasibility depends on your tools, data and available access.
Update the CRM and prepare the next action after an incoming request; when due, suggest a follow-up if the case allows it.
Check the recipient, duplicates and case status before sending, with a stop rule when the customer replies.
Identify the topic and suggest a reply using approved content, then hand cases outside the scope to a person.
Provide human handover and acknowledge missing information without inventing a price or commitment.
Help a colleague find a procedure or prepare a summary within a set of approved documents.
Respect access permissions, show useful references and check that documents are current.
We start with a limited process to check its usefulness before expanding the automation.
Describe the trigger, required data, actions, exceptions and process owner.
Check possible connections, build the flow or assistant and test normal cases, errors and access.
Document rules, train users and specify alerts, manual recovery and the agreed follow-up.
Cost depends on the number of tools to connect, data quality, exceptions to handle and the level of ongoing support required.
Discuss my automation projectNot always, but you need a reliable source for the contact, case status and latest action. We check whether your current tools are sufficient or follow-up needs to be organised first.
Compatibility is checked before commitment: data exchange features, access, subscriptions, limits and vendor terms. We do not assume every application can be connected in the same way.
That depends on scope and the consequences of an error. We define allowed responses, handover cases and actions requiring approval; a draft reviewed by a person can be a suitable starting point.
Process examples, business rules and usable content are enough to begin the assessment. For tests, we prefer fictional or anonymised data and check permitted access and use.
The workflow should detect the error, alert someone and recover without creating duplicates. Intervention and maintenance arrangements are specified in the proposal; continuous support is not assumed.
The schedule follows an assessment of the process, access and required tests. A limited scope helps validate an initial version; the full project’s timeline cannot be inferred from a prototype’s turnaround.
Describe what triggers the task, the tools involved and what takes time. We can examine an initial scope with you.